WealthyUgandanPrince

@McCain I mean put rules in place like i have seen before like if they're outnumbered 4:1 or something like that, if this argument comes up a lot obviously a lot of people want it changed bc it's absolutely retarded and unfair that you get hit with a rubber bullet that can somehow penetrate a wall and fall to the ground for as long as you do, what counter argument is there to that it's dumb as **** and unrealistic, i thought being accurate to real life situations was the point of roleplay lol

for the love of god can someone please change the rules/police sop's so that in a situation where there is a heavily armed/armored gunman the cops can't just one tap you and knock you down for a whole ****ing year, not only is it unrealistic in the sense that a level 4 vest, which is rated to stop bullets from an assault rifle, does literally nothing against a rubber pellet or tazer prongs, but also in the sense that if cops are getting shot at with rifles by people wearing body armor they'd definitely be cracking out something stronger than tazers and rubber bullets. I think that armor lvl 3 and up should either be tazer/knockdown proof or at least be able to more than one hit (perhaps even add a virtual vest to the market that can take a few shots) , or that there should be an escalation of force for rebel/cartel outside of sydney limits where for example, a gang of armored ak-12 wielding fellas driving striders gun down a cop need to either be killed or completely surrounded and outgunned and forced to surrender or be physically restrained.